tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post3102031216240279253..comments2023-11-03T13:58:45.214+05:30Comments on BLANK NOISE: For the Pink Chaddi Campaign:Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger101125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-13812628946302340852011-03-16T11:38:15.657+05:302011-03-16T11:38:15.657+05:30Yes,
This is so sexy information posts in this pag...Yes,<br />This is so sexy information posts in this page any women sleep time nice feeling in sexy pink panty. This is so nice or use full case this inform I like this important or use full thinking. I have read in this blog so interesting. You’re sexy choice best in this site. I agree in your pink chaddi very hot women use in this.Phone Sexhttp://www.humiliateme.co.uk/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-17860508878251124042010-01-09T23:53:17.597+05:302010-01-09T23:53:17.597+05:30All ya 'Ram Sena' a$$hats in India:
You p...All ya 'Ram Sena' a$$hats in India:<br /><br />You ppl are gutless bitches.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-49127076993240090302009-04-01T02:15:00.000+05:302009-04-01T02:15:00.000+05:30No, Nainap, I would not want to marry a woman who ...No, Nainap, I would not want to marry a woman who "sleeps around". But does that mean I will reject all non-virgins? Absolutely not. Just because you have sex outside marriage does not mean you "sleep around" with every man you meet. Just because you are not at one extreme does not mean you have to be at the other. I want to marry a woman who expresses her sexuality in a healthy way, for her happiness, under her control, and not for popularity, material gain or rebellion. I know you may find this a bit difficult to stomach, but most women actually like to have sex; they're just conditioned to deny it. Not to mention all the double standards in a society that looks away when men go as far as to literally "sleep around", but make it look like the end of the world when women have even one sexual encounter outside marriage. I want to marry a sexually healthy woman and expect her to want a sexually healthy man. And I will teach my daughters AND sons to be express their sexualities in healthy and responsible ways, so that when they become adults, they will neither spin out of control into sexual self-destruction nor live in miserable sexual repression.Sohan D'souzahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00145167756320572028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-79002523999701192682009-03-16T12:44:00.000+05:302009-03-16T12:44:00.000+05:30Srejith Do you define your culture on how your wom...Srejith Do you define your culture on how your women folk behave or dress up?Appreciating and valuing your culture doesn't mean following what our forefathers set as definition of civilized society centuries back.Many of those stereotypes and so called were broken or conveniently modified by our fathers and same is bound to happen to what our parents defined as our CULTURE.This generation is different from previous and that will always hold true..as will the resistance of old to change.Pub was linked to rich,spoilt and promiscuous people by you people.And you have no right to impose your or Sena's view of what is perfectly lawful and unharmful act of visiting a pub and having some good time as a taboo and all those who do it as uncivilized people.So you respect women to say beating women is not appreciable.So you want them to behave as male chauvinist want and then pray them.Yes parents should teach teenagers warn them against the things that could harm them because they have seen more life.But guiding children and forcing them to behave as per their definition of culture.Please will you sneak into a pub you so much despise and see for yourself what people do in a pub.What we do with there we can do same on road because there is nothing immoral in it.Yes elders lived in different generation and they will have different definition of what is right and wrong. So all of you will epitomize the cause of some goons now to make your daughters behave like your sisters and mothers did? Thrashing a women happens almost in every household so the was nothing new in it,we r opposing the very cause that u support which labels a women going to pub as immoral.And all those women r opposing it because even if they may never choose to go to pub this labeling is robbing the freedom men rightfully enjoy.All of you who call those teens going to pub as immoral would actually ogle at them and given an opportunity take advantage of them.Let us live our lives,we had nothing to do with your politics.Mind your own teen daughter because you think she is bound to carry ur lineage and uphold your name and culture.But please for once trust her She like other girls going to pub are custodian of their lives,educated and wise enough to judge right and wrong.And none of your teachings are going waste.And didn't you tell lies to your dad to smoke or booze with friends? Your generation changed the outlook of what's right or wrong too we are doing the same.Is the uproar only because its women joining the rebels..because we in INDIAN CULTURE cut their wings,abuse them,make them behave,dress as we want and then keep them in temples.mayank_madhavhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16811579946421889108noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-85900702776111207702009-03-15T11:49:00.000+05:302009-03-15T11:49:00.000+05:30Definitely, we must ensure the freedom of women. ...Definitely, we must ensure the freedom of women. But, freedom doesn’t mean that it is the license to do any thing. Any Indian knows that the pub culture is spoiling our very valuable culture. So, what the inspiration behind the sreeram sena did is much appreciated. But, the way to against this kind of worst culture should be in a different way. (Beating to women is really not appreciatable). <BR/><BR/>This is the responsibility of parents (or public) that to guide their children or friends from this kind of worst culture (especially teenagers). <BR/>But, I really wondered when almost all the women’s association and public comments came forward to supporting to the pub culture instead of opposing???.<BR/><BR/>*** Sense the self abilities and Values. Imitate only good things from outer world. Remember, all things what you do will reflect entire world without knowing of you even if it is a minor. So, think-say-do carefully.***Sreejith. P.Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17441288189230332980noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-45103324649848095442009-03-09T22:15:00.000+05:302009-03-09T22:15:00.000+05:30Now khaki plays moral police when they arrest 101 ...Now khaki plays moral police when they arrest 101 people including 22 woman enjoying drinks in farmhouse near ramanagaram report in front page of times of India today the 9th March . <BR/><BR/>Note serving liquor is bailable offense in India I fail to understand how the police can treated it otherwise . If party has lound noise in usa and some calls 911 then the police would actually ask to reduce the noise to the organisers. <BR/><BR/>I am a staunch anti feminists but I would agree that pink chaddies ( which is feminists dominated ) have got it right. <BR/><BR/>That it happened on womens day is fishy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-9610847595897691992009-02-16T16:05:00.000+05:302009-02-16T16:05:00.000+05:30Hi!!!The point is not to ridicule any religion, bu...Hi!!!<BR/><BR/>The point is not to ridicule any religion, but it's to drive a point that many things in general mass concise is nothing more than perceivement of static <BR/>1. idea of religion, <BR/>2. idea of culture,<BR/>3. idea of thoughts,<BR/>4. idea of living a life,<BR/>etc<BR/><BR/>and this perceived populism which takes the form of belief is always, happen to be an concentric propaganda of few selfish group's in society for their own vested interest be it in lines / names of religion, culture, nationality, ethnicity etc. This propaganda has nothing to do with reality nor is ever meant to serve the interest of society or human beings at large. It's only to serve the few who preach opposite to have their say or hold on society but themselves never practice- as in reality it is not to be practiced or live such a life.<BR/><BR/>Culture or Religion both have intermingled; in simplicity terms let me say- <BR/>Religion is nothing but a permanent truth consisting of <BR/>1. to be honest to oneself & all.<BR/>2. to have compassion for all.<BR/>3. to be educated.<BR/>4. to have broad horizon.<BR/>5. respect for all.<BR/>etc<BR/><BR/>Now another truth in religion can be associated but is not permanent truth i.e. this truth is in fact to be dependent with respect to time & space.<BR/>1. In Muslim’s it’s allowed to have four wives for men. This had relevance during those times as anarchy & blood shed was the norm in that part of the society of earth and that’s the reason for it. As during those day’s taking more than one women was already into practice- so in order to limit it somehow this number got associated. But hardly we find the case now, though the practice has religion sanctity or societal & legal sanctity but not practiced as it’s irrelevant in today’s time in most part of world including Arab countries.<BR/>On similar lines to wear burkha, to count days seeing moon, to have white color cloths with men & headscarf etc,<BR/>All this reflects the relevance of that time & condition of society. But today with the modern technology one can drive in sunny hot days in AC car, water is available freely everywhere in Arab countries because of desalination plants, travelling is no more preferred at night to avoid harsh heat in the day etc.<BR/><BR/>Similarly in India introduction of pardah gained during the chaotic times & that too came into force only in rajput & kshatriya clans as they were into fighting’s, to avoid their women getting unwanted attention from enemy, similarly sati practice came not from religion but from the individual women’s specifically meant for suicide so as to escape the wrath of enemy who after conquering used to inflict wounds, atrocities on them to instill the fear among their enemy in general etc. This some how started in kings courtyard also gained momentum among the soldiers and influential person's of the defeated kingdom. Some how the vested interest within the society started this to be associated with religion. But all this is irrelevant in today's time & during that time too it was never the religious duty.<BR/><BR/>Rajput again is hunk dynasty but got intermingled with the Indian people. So basically its outsider, now do we throw them out.<BR/><BR/>So how could one say that any influence from west should be thrown out, that too when it’s of no harm. If that is shall we stop wearing pants, shirt, underwear’s etc and switch to dhoti, lungi, langota etc.<BR/><BR/>Should we also stop the boys playing holy with girls, don't they enjoy themselves? We play with sister, mom & also with girls who are not our relatives and flirt with them- all being the part of it. It leads to sex, it leads to marriage, it leads to just one night stands too etc depending on the consenting individual's desire, wants & tastes. SO whats wrong isn't all this- what constitutes life.<BR/><BR/>But we as society & individual would definitely oppose, if all this is initiated by any men or women to anyone who does not like it or is not consenting partner in his/her initiative towards him/her.<BR/><BR/>Similarly all those who visit temple including you & me, even flirt their too, by this act the sanctity of the holy temple does not diminishes. But if a boy or girl even forces deliberately with another person of his / her choice only, in closed doors of bedroom without the consent of his/her partner then its wrong.<BR/><BR/>My mom is uneducated, sari wearing women. She is uneducated not because those time in society women were not been sent to school. No, that time also women used to go school but from those family who could afford it & were too educated themselves but yes true it was not common or general in society. Now that’s not the case so we find everyone getting educated. Similarly is with cloths, even salwar kameez my mom does not wear but that is not the case with my sis or wife, they wear jeans too. So it only shows the good times of now that the society is having real freedom.<BR/><BR/>So was case with my dad till school he used to wear dhoti, started wearing pant's only in college. My dad & mom is +65 yrs now.<BR/><BR/>Men of those times and now too, don't they see women who is clad in sari or burkha. Don't they enjoy their movements? Is that my wife, or sis or let be anyone's daughter when they go out their body is not been admired, lusted, wanted etc or she won't be flirting. Don't we do it? But the question is whether it’s subtle, consenting or is it bullying, un-consented move etc. <BR/><BR/>The pink chaddi campaign terming it as loose, forward & modern women is nothing but a forceful way of saying to the militant self proclaimed lecherous fanatical person's & their school of thought that " the above label of their generalization of them (women) is their distorted view point & vilification of the independence of women’s of today’s....." in deft facade / veil of nationalism or religion or culture, but the bottom line to see that the women remain subservient to them. They do not want them to be equals though the God has created them as equal entity. These are the groups who also are practicing racism in name of casteism, dravidan’s etc. All the time the objective of this self styled, self proclaimed thekedar of society- being to divide and keep the general masses unprogressive & bind them in some false emotional notion of Holiness.<BR/><BR/>Good by giving them panties the women have aptly exposed these fanatics, that this is their real intention at looking them. So take this panty & yes we are the loose, forward & modern- so what.<BR/><BR/>If these guys want to practice what they trying to shout- then why not- when these fanatics move on road look at the women’s feet or on women’s face only. But plsssssssss do not enforce their narrow, bigoted version of sanskarism to others.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-41639172572214453002009-02-16T15:29:00.000+05:302009-02-16T15:29:00.000+05:30Hi!!!The point is not to ridicule any religion, bu...Hi!!!<BR/><BR/>The point is not to ridicule any religion, but it's to drive a point that many things in general mass conscise is nothing more than percivement of static <BR/>1. idea of religion, <BR/>2. idea of culture,<BR/>3. idea of thoughts,<BR/>4. idea of living a life,<BR/>etc<BR/><BR/>and this perceived populism which takes the form of belief is always happen to be an concentric propaganda of few selfish group's in society for their own vested interest be it in lines / names of religion, culture, nationality, ethnicity etc. This propaganda has nothing to do with reality nor is ever meant to serve the interest of society or human beings at large. It's only to serve the few who preach opposite to have thier say or hold on society but themselves never practise as in reality it is not to be practised or live such a life.<BR/><BR/>Culture or Religion both have intermingled; in simplicity terms let me say- <BR/>Religion is nothing but a permanent truth consisting of <BR/>1. to be honest to oneself & all.<BR/>2. to have compassion for all.<BR/>3. to be educated.<BR/>4. to have broad horizon.<BR/>5. respect for all.<BR/>etc<BR/><BR/><BR/>Now another truth in religion can be associated but is not permanent truth i.e. this truth is in fact to be dependent with respect to time & space.<BR/>1. in muslim's its allowed to have four wives for men. This had relevant during those times as anarchy & blood shed was the norm in that part of the society of earth and thats the reason for it . But hardly we find the case now, though the practise has religion sanctity or societal & legal sanctity but not practised as is irrelevant in most of the part of world including Arab countries.<BR/>on similar lines to wear burkha, to count days seeing moon, to have white color cloths with men & headscarf etc<BR/><BR/>all this reflects the relevance of that time & condition of society. But today with the modern technology one can drive in sunny hot days in AC car, water is avialable freely everywhere in arab countires because of desalination plants, travelling is no more prefferred at night because of heat etc.<BR/><BR/>Similarly in india introduction of purdah gained during the chaotic times & that too came into force only in rajput & kshatriya clans as they were into fightings, to avoid their women to be of unwanted attention from enemy, similarly sati practise came not from religion but from the individual womens specifically meant for sucide so as to escape the wrath of enemy who after conquering used to inflict wounds, attrocities on them to instill the fear among thier enemy in general etc. This some how started in kings courtyard also gained momentum among the soldiers and influencial person's of the defeated kingdom. SOme how the vested interest within the society started this to be associated with religion. But all this is irrelevant in today's time & during that time too it was never the religious duty.<BR/><BR/>Rajput again is hunk dynasty but got intermingled with the indian people. So basically its outsider. Now do we throw them out.<BR/><BR/>So how could one say that any influence from west should be thrown out, that too when its of no harm. If that is shall we stop wearing pants, shirt, underwears etc and switch to dhoti, lungi, langota etc.<BR/><BR/>Should we also stop the boys playing holy with girls, don't they enjoy themselves. We play with sister, mom & also with girls who are not our relatives and flirt being the part of it. It leads to sex, it leads to marriage, it leads to just one night stands too etc depending on the consenting individual's desire, wants & tastes. SO whats wrong, isn't all this is what constitutes life.<BR/><BR/>But we as society & individual would definately oppose if all this is intiated by any men or women to anyone who does not like it or is not consenting partner in his/her initiative towards him/her.<BR/><BR/>Similarly all those who visit temple including you & me even flirt their too, by this act the sanctity of the holy temple does not diminishes. But if a boy or girl even forces deliberately with another person of his / her choice only in closed doors of bedroom without the consent of his/her partner then its wrong.<BR/><BR/>My mom is uneducated, sari wearing women. She is uneducated not because that time insociety women were not been sent to school. No that time also women used to go school but from those family who could afford it & were too educated themselves but yes true it was not common or general in society. Now thats not the case so we find everyone getting educated. Similarly is with cloths, even salwar kameez my mom does not wear but that is not the case with my sis or wife, they wear jeans too. So it only shows the good times of now that the society is having real freedom.<BR/><BR/>So was case with my dad till school he used to wear dhoti, started wearing pant's only in colleage. My dad & mom is +65 yrs now.<BR/><BR/>Men of those times and now too don't they see women who is clad is sari or burkha. Don't they enjoy thier movements. Is that my wife, or sis or let be anyone's daughter when they go out their body is not been admired, lusted, wanted etc Or she won't be flirting. Don't we do it. But the question is wheather its subtle, consenting or is it bullying, unconsented move etc. <BR/><BR/>The pink chaddi campaign terming it as loose, forward & modern women is nothing but a forceful way of saying to the militant self proclaimed leacherous fanatical person's & thier school of thought that " the above label of thier generalaisation of them (women) is thier distorted view point & vilification of the independent women of todays....." in deft facade / veil of deft nationalism or religion but having the bottom line to see that the women remain subservient to them. They do not want them to be equals thought the God has created them as equal entity. <BR/><BR/>Good by giving them panty's the women have aptly exposed these fantics that this is their real intention at looking them. So take this panty & yes we are the loose, forward & modern- so what.<BR/><BR/>If these guys want to practise then why when these fanatics move on road don't ask them to see any women's body rather ask them to move & see only the women face. But plsssssssss do not enforce thier narrow, bigoted version of sanskarism to others.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-15705841315017368192009-02-15T21:35:00.000+05:302009-02-15T21:35:00.000+05:30Mary used to have intimate relationship with men w...Mary used to have intimate relationship with men who used to come to drink in her backyard.<BR/><BR/>And one of them was Jesus's father infact.<BR/><BR/>Bible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-38997039242841114082009-02-15T21:34:00.000+05:302009-02-15T21:34:00.000+05:30yes,Please see the following factsIt is proven fac...yes,<BR/>Please see the following facts<BR/><BR/>It is proven fact that Jesus used to go to strip tease and watch shows(Obviously then time strip tease clubs) in Jeruselem.<BR/><BR/>Jesus also had a wine factory beside his native house and mother of Jesus had many workers who used to work for the wine factory.<BR/><BR/>Mary also used to have intimate relationship with people who used to come to drink all night in the mary's backyard.<BR/><BR/>So it is proven fact that women used to drink according to Bible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-76285886086280277842009-02-15T01:30:00.000+05:302009-02-15T01:30:00.000+05:30when it comes jesus times ...thy jesus used to str...when it comes jesus times ...thy jesus used to strip tease in front of inncoent people..at thaat time alll thought that it is a kind of holy stuff...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-74960510132566025752009-02-14T09:13:00.000+05:302009-02-14T09:13:00.000+05:30Having read some threads here, where men are again...Having read some threads here, where men are against women drinking, please note the following :<BR/>Sita used to consume wine <BR/>(After recovering his kidnapped wife Sita from Lanka, Rama's coronation is performed upon returning to Ayodhya. Both Rama and Sita spend their evenings enjoying wine as well as succulent well-cooked meats in the Asoka-grove. The following quote which captures this regal scene is from Uttarakanda sarga 52 (or sarga 42 in some editions) of Valmiki Ramayana)<BR/><BR/>Kama Sutra – Which religious followers can ever lay claim on a book like the Kamsutra. Imagine if the Jihandis had read this book, the world would have been a very peaceful place to live. They are promised of the some virgins after martyrdom, in Hinduism its part of daily life, who the hell wants to die! It’s another thing that most Indian men may not have read or tried the various positions. Imagine the Jihandis are told to make love 5 times a day. <BR/><BR/>Khajuraho – The meticulously described positions by the sculptures at Khajuraho proclaims the arrival of a highly evolved religion. A religion which is not scared of its sexuality. Today when debates rage within various religious groups between contraception’s and pre martial sex we don’t even blink an eyelid on these issues. Until a ruckus is created by semi literate groups or sexually frustrated uncle in some God<BR/>forsaken corner of the country. <BR/><BR/>When the Church is petrified on the thought that Christ might have had a daughter, we know what a play boy Krishna was.<BR/><BR/>Finally in regards to attire, Amar Chitra Katha’s sketches of the Apsara’s is the ultimate in sensual clothing. If the Ram Sena is demanding that all girls should wear similar cloths, please forward me your membership form, I will love to join your gang. Till then am biased to Lord KrishnaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-84676196797098903532009-02-14T09:12:00.000+05:302009-02-14T09:12:00.000+05:30Having read some threads here, where men are again...Having read some threads here, where men are against women drinking, please note the following :<BR/>Sita used to consume wine <BR/>(After recovering his kidnapped wife Sita from Lanka, Rama's coronation is performed upon returning to Ayodhya. Both Rama and Sita spend their evenings enjoying wine as well as succulent well-cooked meats in the Asoka-grove. The following quote which captures this regal scene is from Uttarakanda sarga 52 (or sarga 42 in some editions) of Valmiki Ramayana)<BR/><BR/>Kama Sutra – Which religious followers can ever lay claim on a book like the Kamsutra. Imagine if the Jihandis had read this book, the world would have been a very peaceful place to live. They are promised of the some virgins after martyrdom, in Hinduism its part of daily life, who the hell wants to die! It’s another thing that most Indian men may not have read or tried the various positions. Imagine the Jihandis are told to make love 5 times a day. <BR/><BR/>Khajuraho – The meticulously described positions by the sculptures at Khajuraho proclaims the arrival of a highly evolved religion. A religion which is not scared of its sexuality. Today when debates rage within various religious groups between contraception’s and pre martial sex we don’t even blink an eyelid on these issues. Until a ruckus is created by semi literate groups or sexually frustrated uncle in some God<BR/>forsaken corner of the country. <BR/><BR/>When the Church is petrified on the thought that Christ might have had a daughter, we know what a play boy Krishna was.<BR/><BR/>Finally in regards to attire, Amar Chitra Katha’s sketches of the Apsara’s is the ultimate in sensual clothing. If the Ram Sena is demanding that all girls should wear similar cloths, please forward me your membership form, I will love to join your gang. Till then am biased to Lord KrishnaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-51792933106934020302009-02-13T23:32:00.000+05:302009-02-13T23:32:00.000+05:30Did any of you read what "keesur" said?? Scroll up...Did any of you read what "keesur" said?? Scroll up.. A couple of posts above.. Fuckin Hillarious !!!! :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-4522232016435752552009-02-13T17:25:00.000+05:302009-02-13T17:25:00.000+05:30My View:Pink Chaddi Pros n Cons<A HREF="http://freembastuff.com/readarticle.php?article=PINK%20CHADDI" REL="nofollow">My View:Pink Chaddi Pros n Cons</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-37170077458230894672009-02-13T13:54:00.000+05:302009-02-13T13:54:00.000+05:30oh right! what if he has a chaddi fetish- do you r...oh right! what if he has a chaddi fetish- do you really think it will defeat the purpose?! it will simply be a very public confession. will defeat HIS purpose for sureAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-79005305685735679472009-02-13T12:04:00.000+05:302009-02-13T12:04:00.000+05:30Is this a pink chaddi campaign or pink panty campa...Is this a pink chaddi campaign or pink panty campaign? If Muthalik has a panty fetish, then this campaign will be self-defeating.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-55612347814390670182009-02-13T05:54:00.000+05:302009-02-13T05:54:00.000+05:30its true that sriram sena is not our moral police ...its true that sriram sena is not our moral police agency.it is our right 2 speak 2 someone,even if it is a boy or girl,a hindu or muslim.if anyone try 2 put restriction on it,it is violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by our constitution;that is violation of FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND EXPRESSION.i surprise , why all the human rights activists are not moving 2 the court 2 take some kind of legal action..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-33367520620015153422009-02-13T00:45:00.000+05:302009-02-13T00:45:00.000+05:30raja..you're a goddammed imbecile...why don't you ...raja..<BR/>you're a goddammed imbecile...<BR/><BR/>why don't you shove your head up your arse and see what you're made of!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-17701917754816130482009-02-13T00:41:00.000+05:302009-02-13T00:41:00.000+05:30mayank_madhav ..I a mother of 25 year old son. No ...mayank_madhav ..I a mother of 25 year old son. No girl here!!! So think before leaving the comments. Mayank..one question would you marry a girl who frequents pubs and sleeps around with other men???????????????????????? Indian men are big hypocrites.<BR/><BR/>naina...<BR/>i don't give a shit if she HAD slept around...<BR/><BR/>you seem to treat your virginity like some priceless artifact...lemme te you it isin'tAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-90522795020297114582009-02-13T00:33:00.000+05:302009-02-13T00:33:00.000+05:30nainap...if you have a daughter ( and i hope you d...nainap...if you have a daughter ( and i hope you don't)... put a chastity belt around here and chain her to a tree...btw have you ever heard of something called a condom???Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-83129009345453244512009-02-13T00:26:00.000+05:302009-02-13T00:26:00.000+05:30Something from West being Replicated and Needs to ...Something from West being Replicated and Needs to Addressed ....<BR/><BR/>They just can keep on Abusing Hinduism.... That's all they can do in the name of so called Human Rights ... <BR/><BR/>No wonder All the males supporting this movement will never can ask females in their family to Send their PINK CHADDI's.<BR/><BR/>Someone can ask them to view the information below and then they can blame whomsoever they wish to (your movement is just replication of incidents happening in UK)<BR/><BR/>Below are some documented examples of cases recorded by established media sources in UK.<BR/><BR/>VICTIM ACCOUNTS OF THIS HAPPENING TO THEM ON<BR/><BR/>BBC ASIAN NETWORK RADIO ("NIHAL" - 20 June 2007, Wed 9am) AND MORE:<BR/>http://sikhhelpline.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40&Itemid=42<BR/><BR/>British Sikh Girl Talks About Predatory Muslim Males:<BR/>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-2mG_z23VU&feature=related<BR/><BR/>5 Live report on Pakistani men grooming young white girls:<BR/>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pADxqQwgNI<BR/><BR/>EOTC Report on Pakistani Men Grooming Kaffir Girls for Sex:<BR/>http://youtube.com/watch?v=yM6SHsWzeS8<BR/>http://youtube.com/watch?v=HoaMJaFoNwA<BR/>http://youtube.com/watch?v=laaMkLfZAi8<BR/><BR/>Grooming of white girls for sex by Asian Muslims is exposed:<BR/>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2237940.ece<BR/>Evidence of British Pakistani Muslim Sexual Abuse Gangs:<BR/>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2538090.ece<BR/><BR/>Current Known Areas being affected:<BR/>BEDFORDSHIRE<BR/>BLACKBURN <BR/>BRADFORD<BR/>COVENTRY<BR/>Derby<BR/>Glasgow<BR/>LEEDS<BR/>Leicester<BR/>MANCHESTER<BR/>NOTTINGHAM<BR/>BIRMINGHAM<BR/>LONDON <BR/><BR/>http://youtube.com/watch?v=yM6SHsWzeS8<BR/>http://youtube.com/watch?v=HoaMJaFoNwA<BR/>http://youtube.com/watch?v=laaMkLfZAi8<BR/><BR/>These are not “claims", it is real, documented evidence is not required to show you something is real.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07021527723901346651noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-10118248584489393652009-02-12T18:04:00.000+05:302009-02-12T18:04:00.000+05:30Mr mayank_madhav sir.. I didn know that you will g...Mr mayank_madhav sir.. I didn know that you will get offended by the words i used. I thought that you and your family are modern <BR/>and support such free talks with your mom and sis... <BR/><BR/>One fact i can tell about you is that, u never thought a person wud say such things to you..You felt bad(even i felt bad) when u saw the <BR/>Mangalore event in TV and when u heard that there is a chaddi campaign going on u jumped into it with full josh.. <BR/><BR/>I am a person ( into my 30s now) who used to frequent most of the pubs and discos in Bangalore...I've never seen people doing sex<BR/>in a pub... But i wud say that, thats the point where people starts taking the wrong way...in this forum I've seen people quoting the <BR/>old indian tradition of kotta and thing like that.. But the people who used go there was never considered modern or decent... I cannot say<BR/>that women can't go to pub and have drinks... because i've gone there and had drinks many time.. But at the same time i cannot<BR/>support a campaign which is telling women to go to pub...(even it were for men).. Thats stupidity... You can never say good things<BR/>about consuming alcohol...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-58718509101663830072009-02-12T17:31:00.000+05:302009-02-12T17:31:00.000+05:30hithis is maddy here first i would like to say am ...hi<BR/>this is maddy here first i would like to say am also against the attack on the pub and thay should have not hit the girls so roudely, for that MISTER . MUTHALIK has asked SORRY . and the case is going on in the court. my first question to you is ARE YOU REALLY A INDIA WOMEN ? if it is YES . then you should have not gone up to panties to HUMILIATE.. muthalik... wat dose that mean if you people are sending ur panties to him ?is that the way to protest ? i strongly condomen the way wat ur doing .... my second question to you in and also to whom all are sending their chaddis is are you people ok if(just think) ur daughter is going to pub and boozing with her boyfriend,and her boy friend once he is fully drunk he starts playing with the upper body of the girl and next he moves down to her hip and down..down ..... down... finally they moves to bed and you will be knowing well what they both do so is this wat pub leads to.... are you ok with this culture and are you ok if (just think)ur dearer one do"s all this ......NO NO .......... no respected indian controls all this its really horrible to think and this is wat happening in pub all most 98% of people going to pub do"s the same above ..... so to protest you are going with PINK CHADDI.....???????????/ if today MAHATHMA GANDHI JI was alive he would have cummited something>>>>>>>>>. please think befor you start any protest ..... why am saying all this to you is in INDIA WOMENS HAVE A VERY GOOD RESPECT BECOUSE OF THEIR ATTITUDE ..... FIRST YOU GO THROUGH WITH IT... and also go through with the police records you will come to know how many teenagers commiting robbery,theft,smuggling,and many more mistake things to enjoy all this meaningless pub or rave party culture... TODAY YOU HAVE STARTED PROTESTING WITH YOUR AND YOUR SUPPORTERS CHADDIS BECAUSE THE RAM SENA PEOPLE ATTACKED PUB.IF U HAVE A GUTS FIRST TRY TO KNOW HOW MANY SMALL GIRLS FORCIBLY PUSHED INTO PROSTITUTION IN REDLIGHT AREAS. GO FIRST PROTEST AND PROTECT THOSE GIRLS ......... dont TRY TO GET PUBLICITY WITH BLOGS ............. I FINALLY FEEL TO SAY THOSE WHO SEND THE CHADDIS THEY ARE UNFIT TO SAY THEMSELVES THAT THEY ARE INDIANS..........keesurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13887867854582513993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10387075.post-57590794264056482772009-02-12T17:17:00.000+05:302009-02-12T17:17:00.000+05:30I just fail to see the point of the whole effort.I just fail to see the point of the whole effort.Blogger Bhaiyyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03924725480002292488noreply@blogger.com